Discussion:
Michael Glasser SnitAppleScript is too much for Snit sock Snit Michael Glasser
(too old to reply)
Steve Carroll
2021-09-08 17:56:43 UTC
Permalink
When I got here, I wanted to be reasonable and nonjudgemental. I gave Snit
sock Snit Michael Glasser more than a credible person generally would.

How many more chances does Snit sock Snit Michael Glasser's dim witted
ass (a shoe knows more than Snit sock Snit Michael Glasser and is useful)
need to prove their Diesel spamming accusation with support?

Snit sock Snit Michael Glasser can only understand from the perspective
of a programmer. It was Snit sock Snit Michael Glasser who forged me (and
others) and admitted to having done so.

Don't get too egotistical, Snit sock Snit Michael Glasser, sometimes "cigars"
are just that. I quoted examples of Snit sock Snit Michael Glasser blaming
me for the actions of others, focusing on ego and not tech, etc. His response:
to repeat the same nonsense.
--
"You'll notice how quickly he loses interest when everything is about him.
He clearly wants the attention"
Steven Petruzzellis, making the dumbest comment ever uttered.
Diesel / Gremlin
2021-09-09 09:49:52 UTC
Permalink
Post by Steve Carroll
When I got here, I wanted to be reasonable and nonjudgemental. I gave Snit
sock Snit Michael Glasser more than a credible person generally would.
How many more chances does Snit sock Snit Michael Glasser's dim witted
ass (a shoe knows more than Snit sock Snit Michael Glasser and is useful)
need to prove their Diesel spamming accusation with support?
Snit sock Snit Michael Glasser can only understand from the perspective
of a programmer. It was Snit sock Snit Michael Glasser who forged me (and
others) and admitted to having done so.
Don't get too egotistical, Snit sock Snit Michael Glasser, sometimes "cigars"
are just that. I quoted examples of Snit sock Snit Michael Glasser blaming
to repeat the same nonsense.
--
"You'll notice how quickly he loses interest when everything is about him.
He clearly wants the attention"
Steven Petruzzellis, making the dumbest comment ever uttered.
I am working on an idea which will show off how weak Linux is. Snit must
have read Vallor signature lines and became wildly envious. I suspect this
is our first demonstration of the improved Snit.

That's our Vallor, though, no need for morals or so they say. Believes
if your machine/network is online, he's got the right to use your resources,
whether you agree or not. It was Vallor who forged me and bragged about
it. Google for 'functionally illiterate fraud' and Dustin Cook pops up:
<https://duckduckgo.com/?q=dustin%20cook%20functionally%20illiterate%20fraud>.



-
Puppy Videos
https://www.realtyhop.com/property-records/search?q=glasser%2C+michael
Dustin Cook: Functionally Illiterate Fraud
Steve Carroll
2021-09-10 16:31:58 UTC
Permalink
Post by Steve Carroll
When I got here, I wanted to be reasonable and nonjudgemental. I gave Snit
sock Snit Michael Glasser more than a credible person generally would.
How many more chances does Snit sock Snit Michael Glasser's dim witted
ass (a shoe knows more than Snit sock Snit Michael Glasser and is useful)
need to prove their Diesel spamming accusation with support?
Snit sock Snit Michael Glasser can only understand from the perspective
of a programmer. It was Snit sock Snit Michael Glasser who forged me (and
others) and admitted to having done so.
Don't get too egotistical, Snit sock Snit Michael Glasser, sometimes "cigars"
are just that. I quoted examples of Snit sock Snit Michael Glasser blaming
to repeat the same nonsense.
--
"You'll notice how quickly he loses interest when everything is about him.
He clearly wants the attention"
Steven Petruzzellis, making the dumbest comment ever uttered.
I bet Mike Easter thinks his wife's life was perfect. Another bottle
you mean, Mike Easter drinks them down damn quick.

Um, in Mike Easter's 'view', that a file has been published is "confirmation"
that Apd designed it now?

Mike Easter can only think from the perspective of a sociopath.

This is something you know nothing about.


--
E-commerce Simplified
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=Dustin+Cook+the+functional+illiterate+fraud
https://winthropmemorials.org/veterans/eightnames/files/Eight-Names-
Winthrops-VietnamVeterans-Pinzur.pdf
<https://www.usphonebook.com/423-491-1448?Dustin-Cook&Diesel&Gremlin>
Dustin Cook: Functional Illiterate Fraud
STALKING_TARGET_06
2021-09-11 04:14:04 UTC
Permalink
Post by Steve Carroll
Post by Steve Carroll
When I got here, I wanted to be reasonable and nonjudgemental. I gave Snit
sock Snit Michael Glasser more than a credible person generally would.
How many more chances does Snit sock Snit Michael Glasser's dim witted
ass (a shoe knows more than Snit sock Snit Michael Glasser and is useful)
need to prove their Diesel spamming accusation with support?
Snit sock Snit Michael Glasser can only understand from the perspective
of a programmer. It was Snit sock Snit Michael Glasser who forged me (and
others) and admitted to having done so.
Don't get too egotistical, Snit sock Snit Michael Glasser, sometimes "cigars"
are just that. I quoted examples of Snit sock Snit Michael Glasser blaming
to repeat the same nonsense.
--
"You'll notice how quickly he loses interest when everything is about him.
He clearly wants the attention"
Steven Petruzzellis, making the dumbest comment ever uttered.
I bet Mike Easter thinks his wife's life was perfect. Another bottle
you mean, Mike Easter drinks them down damn quick.
Um, in Mike Easter's 'view', that a file has been published is "confirmation"
that Apd designed it now?
Mike Easter can only think from the perspective of a sociopath.
This is something you know nothing about.
--
E-commerce Simplified
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=Dustin+Cook+the+functional+illiterate+fraud
https://winthropmemorials.org/veterans/eightnames/files/Eight-Names-
Winthrops-VietnamVeterans-Pinzur.pdf
<https://www.usphonebook.com/423-491-1448?Dustin-Cook&Diesel&Gremlin>
Dustin Cook: Functional Illiterate Fraud
I remain unconvinced that these posts are from a bot.

Anyone who groks John Gohde's posts knows these posts are not written in
the sense Gregory Hall is implying, and some of them are simply hand written.
By listening to 'media talking heads' like that you get moral imperatives
like 'equal rights'. Carried to its (im)moral conclusion, the insistence
that it's 'unjust' for a hetero male to not wish to screw a gay man is born.
John Gohde is the only person I know who had a 'blog' intended to embarrass
me that quickly turned into JavaScript errors with rectangles where pictures/multimedia
used to be, and if you clicked it, you would be reading about a legal brief
that was removed for all time.

Gregory Hall can create a virtual machine. Of course that is not possible
on anything but Linux! That's our John Gohde, though, no need for morals
or so they say. Believes if your machine/software is online, they've got
the right to use your resources, whether you approve or not.

-
Get Rich Slow
https://www.linkedin.com/in/michael-glasser-86860011
https://www.google.com/search?q=Steve+Petruzzellis%3A+narcissistic+bigot
Dustin Cook the functionally illiterate fraud
Steve Carroll
2021-09-10 16:48:31 UTC
Permalink
Post by Steve Carroll
When I got here, I wanted to be reasonable and nonjudgemental. I gave Snit
sock Snit Michael Glasser more than a credible person generally would.
How many more chances does Snit sock Snit Michael Glasser's dim witted
ass (a shoe knows more than Snit sock Snit Michael Glasser and is useful)
need to prove their Diesel spamming accusation with support?
Snit sock Snit Michael Glasser can only understand from the perspective
of a programmer. It was Snit sock Snit Michael Glasser who forged me (and
others) and admitted to having done so.
Don't get too egotistical, Snit sock Snit Michael Glasser, sometimes "cigars"
are just that. I quoted examples of Snit sock Snit Michael Glasser blaming
to repeat the same nonsense.
--
"You'll notice how quickly he loses interest when everything is about him.
He clearly wants the attention"
Steven Petruzzellis, making the dumbest comment ever uttered.
Dustin Cook AKA Diesel AKA Gremlin lying about his 1-423-491-1448 phone
number:

<***@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
-----
Prior to my giving you that cell number, there was no way
at all for you to link it to me in any possible way shape
or form. it doesn't come up in any records search on me.
It is using a recycled number, but damn near everything is
these days so that doesn't count as public information,
snit.
...
As in, the cell doesn't come back to me, wouldn't ever
come back to me, therefore the fact *I* have that cell
number is NOT public information. I find it very hard to
believe that even you'd have difficulty understanding this
concept.
-----

<***@VoX89Pwp95.083.GODrcd>
-----
I've only been sharing whats available via a public
database. You haven't. :)
-----

<***@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
-----
You cannot find any link to that number to me on any
database. Which makes it private. not public as you
incorrectly assume.
-----

<***@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
-----
Post by Steve Carroll
Your number, even tied to your name, is in a public
database.
No, it's not. You already tried to link the two of us
previously.
-----

<***@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
-----
It's not a publically known number that links to me. And
he knows that.
-----

<***@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
-----
The number is NOT TIED TO ME in any public database, in
any way shape or form. You cannot get the number aside
from my having provided it to you via a google search or a
public records search.
-----

<***@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
-----
Regardless of where the number shows up, it doesn't tie
itself to me, and you cannot associate the number with me
via a google search, OR any number of free/paid public
records searches. Therefore, that is PRIVATE information
that you think you're holding over my head, not public as
you erroneously think here.
-----

<***@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
-----
It's not, running my name doesn't provide that cell
number. The two are not linked in any way shape or form.
The number itself as is the case with any recycled number
is in all kinds of databases, but it's not linked to me;
therefore, that IS PRIVATE information that you can't get
via a google search or a paid public records search.
-----

<***@889n4Sx8GWE.MNnkz50hZNVS.fh0SYyRp>
-----
They are relevant to the fact YOU INSERTED the phone
number I provided you verbally into a bogus call log video
you've taken the time to create. When I use the cell I
provided you the number for to make outbound calls, It
*ALWAYS* reports Kingsport, TN. Not one single time has it
ever, nor would it have any reason to report Johnson City.
It doesn't pick cities at random, it doesn't go by my
present location, either. That's actually fixed, as is the
number assigned to the phone.
-----

<***@4uMkH0FFER6s72gSy7J8N4B67.Mht3WTC373bt67J31gn>
-----
You didn't even score the right city, Snit. And, the
correct city is common, public knowledge with the regulars
here. The moment you unblocked 'Johnson City' in your
videos, you were busted.
-----

<***@gt3i2B7y.5N0FOv3e210vLOej4O4doj8b>
-----
David, every single Address you've posted that's supposed
to be mine has been Kingsport. Not Johnson City. Don't you
think you should tell snit that was a fuckup on his part
by now? :)
-----

<***@3R4NM89td0T86C.231IPkH>
-----
His response to that was to file a report with the
kingsport,tn police. Well hell, why not the johnson city
ones? That's where he claimed the call said it originated
from. :)
-----

--
Best CMS Solution of 2017!!
https://www.google.com/search?q=dustin+cook%3A+functionally+illiterate+fraud
https://www.bing.com/search?q=%22functionally%20illiterate%20fraud%22
Steve Petruzzellis the Narcissistic Bigot
Stefen Carroll - fretwizzer
2021-09-10 22:22:29 UTC
Permalink
Post by Steve Carroll
Post by Steve Carroll
When I got here, I wanted to be reasonable and nonjudgemental. I gave Snit
sock Snit Michael Glasser more than a credible person generally would.
How many more chances does Snit sock Snit Michael Glasser's dim witted
ass (a shoe knows more than Snit sock Snit Michael Glasser and is useful)
need to prove their Diesel spamming accusation with support?
Snit sock Snit Michael Glasser can only understand from the perspective
of a programmer. It was Snit sock Snit Michael Glasser who forged me (and
others) and admitted to having done so.
Don't get too egotistical, Snit sock Snit Michael Glasser, sometimes "cigars"
are just that. I quoted examples of Snit sock Snit Michael Glasser blaming
to repeat the same nonsense.
--
"You'll notice how quickly he loses interest when everything is about him.
He clearly wants the attention"
Steven Petruzzellis, making the dumbest comment ever uttered.
Dustin Cook AKA Diesel AKA Gremlin lying about his 1-423-491-1448 phone
-----
Prior to my giving you that cell number, there was no way
at all for you to link it to me in any possible way shape
or form. it doesn't come up in any records search on me.
It is using a recycled number, but damn near everything is
these days so that doesn't count as public information,
snit.
...
As in, the cell doesn't come back to me, wouldn't ever
come back to me, therefore the fact *I* have that cell
number is NOT public information. I find it very hard to
believe that even you'd have difficulty understanding this
concept.
-----
-----
I've only been sharing whats available via a public
database. You haven't. :)
-----
-----
You cannot find any link to that number to me on any
database. Which makes it private. not public as you
incorrectly assume.
-----
-----
Post by Steve Carroll
Your number, even tied to your name, is in a public
database.
No, it's not. You already tried to link the two of us
previously.
-----
-----
It's not a publically known number that links to me. And
he knows that.
-----
-----
The number is NOT TIED TO ME in any public database, in
any way shape or form. You cannot get the number aside
from my having provided it to you via a google search or a
public records search.
-----
-----
Regardless of where the number shows up, it doesn't tie
itself to me, and you cannot associate the number with me
via a google search, OR any number of free/paid public
records searches. Therefore, that is PRIVATE information
that you think you're holding over my head, not public as
you erroneously think here.
-----
-----
It's not, running my name doesn't provide that cell
number. The two are not linked in any way shape or form.
The number itself as is the case with any recycled number
is in all kinds of databases, but it's not linked to me;
therefore, that IS PRIVATE information that you can't get
via a google search or a paid public records search.
-----
-----
They are relevant to the fact YOU INSERTED the phone
number I provided you verbally into a bogus call log video
you've taken the time to create. When I use the cell I
provided you the number for to make outbound calls, It
*ALWAYS* reports Kingsport, TN. Not one single time has it
ever, nor would it have any reason to report Johnson City.
It doesn't pick cities at random, it doesn't go by my
present location, either. That's actually fixed, as is the
number assigned to the phone.
-----
-----
You didn't even score the right city, Snit. And, the
correct city is common, public knowledge with the regulars
here. The moment you unblocked 'Johnson City' in your
videos, you were busted.
-----
-----
David, every single Address you've posted that's supposed
to be mine has been Kingsport. Not Johnson City. Don't you
think you should tell snit that was a fuckup on his part
by now? :)
-----
-----
His response to that was to file a report with the
kingsport,tn police. Well hell, why not the johnson city
ones? That's where he claimed the call said it originated
from. :)
-----
--
Best CMS Solution of 2017!!
https://www.google.com/search?q=dustin+cook%3A+functionally+illiterate+fraud
https://www.bing.com/search?q=%22functionally%20illiterate%20fraud%22
Steve Petruzzellis the Narcissistic Bigot
It is a piece of cake to handpick by bragging about a small number of
exceptions clashing from what's typical. What is more important from an
advocacy perspective are the expected usages. How many more chances does
Flooder Steve Carroll's extremely dim witted ass (a dumb terminal knows
more than Flooder Steve Carroll and is useful) need to prove their Snit
sock accusation with support? Flooder Steve Carroll is far too unintelligent
to write a quality script. The only scripting he's ever shown he can do
is flooding groups.

The Clam engine had a false positive hit, and the GUI ClamXav reported
what the signal processor which isn't created by the same people or company
reported it. I think the point is not really to get innocent posters to
listen to him. The point is likely to piss Snit off for flooding outside
groups he knows I frequent.
--
Get Rich Slow


Dustin Cook is a functional illiterate fraud
HHI the imaginary friend
2021-09-11 07:27:15 UTC
Permalink
Post by Stefen Carroll - fretwizzer
Post by Steve Carroll
Post by Steve Carroll
When I got here, I wanted to be reasonable and nonjudgemental. I gave Snit
sock Snit Michael Glasser more than a credible person generally would.
How many more chances does Snit sock Snit Michael Glasser's dim witted
ass (a shoe knows more than Snit sock Snit Michael Glasser and is useful)
need to prove their Diesel spamming accusation with support?
Snit sock Snit Michael Glasser can only understand from the perspective
of a programmer. It was Snit sock Snit Michael Glasser who forged me (and
others) and admitted to having done so.
Don't get too egotistical, Snit sock Snit Michael Glasser, sometimes "cigars"
are just that. I quoted examples of Snit sock Snit Michael Glasser blaming
to repeat the same nonsense.
--
"You'll notice how quickly he loses interest when everything is about him.
He clearly wants the attention"
Steven Petruzzellis, making the dumbest comment ever uttered.
Dustin Cook AKA Diesel AKA Gremlin lying about his 1-423-491-1448 phone
-----
Prior to my giving you that cell number, there was no way
at all for you to link it to me in any possible way shape
or form. it doesn't come up in any records search on me.
It is using a recycled number, but damn near everything is
these days so that doesn't count as public information,
snit.
...
As in, the cell doesn't come back to me, wouldn't ever
come back to me, therefore the fact *I* have that cell
number is NOT public information. I find it very hard to
believe that even you'd have difficulty understanding this
concept.
-----
-----
I've only been sharing whats available via a public
database. You haven't. :)
-----
-----
You cannot find any link to that number to me on any
database. Which makes it private. not public as you
incorrectly assume.
-----
-----
Post by Steve Carroll
Your number, even tied to your name, is in a public
database.
No, it's not. You already tried to link the two of us
previously.
-----
-----
It's not a publically known number that links to me. And
he knows that.
-----
-----
The number is NOT TIED TO ME in any public database, in
any way shape or form. You cannot get the number aside
from my having provided it to you via a google search or a
public records search.
-----
-----
Regardless of where the number shows up, it doesn't tie
itself to me, and you cannot associate the number with me
via a google search, OR any number of free/paid public
records searches. Therefore, that is PRIVATE information
that you think you're holding over my head, not public as
you erroneously think here.
-----
-----
It's not, running my name doesn't provide that cell
number. The two are not linked in any way shape or form.
The number itself as is the case with any recycled number
is in all kinds of databases, but it's not linked to me;
therefore, that IS PRIVATE information that you can't get
via a google search or a paid public records search.
-----
-----
They are relevant to the fact YOU INSERTED the phone
number I provided you verbally into a bogus call log video
you've taken the time to create. When I use the cell I
provided you the number for to make outbound calls, It
*ALWAYS* reports Kingsport, TN. Not one single time has it
ever, nor would it have any reason to report Johnson City.
It doesn't pick cities at random, it doesn't go by my
present location, either. That's actually fixed, as is the
number assigned to the phone.
-----
-----
You didn't even score the right city, Snit. And, the
correct city is common, public knowledge with the regulars
here. The moment you unblocked 'Johnson City' in your
videos, you were busted.
-----
-----
David, every single Address you've posted that's supposed
to be mine has been Kingsport. Not Johnson City. Don't you
think you should tell snit that was a fuckup on his part
by now? :)
-----
-----
His response to that was to file a report with the
kingsport,tn police. Well hell, why not the johnson city
ones? That's where he claimed the call said it originated
from. :)
-----
--
Best CMS Solution of 2017!!
https://www.google.com/search?q=dustin+cook%3A+functionally+illiterate+fraud
https://www.bing.com/search?q=%22functionally%20illiterate%20fraud%22
Steve Petruzzellis the Narcissistic Bigot
It is a piece of cake to handpick by bragging about a small number of
exceptions clashing from what's typical. What is more important from an
advocacy perspective are the expected usages. How many more chances does
Flooder Steve Carroll's extremely dim witted ass (a dumb terminal knows
more than Flooder Steve Carroll and is useful) need to prove their Snit
sock accusation with support? Flooder Steve Carroll is far too unintelligent
to write a quality script. The only scripting he's ever shown he can do
is flooding groups.
The Clam engine had a false positive hit, and the GUI ClamXav reported
what the signal processor which isn't created by the same people or company
reported it. I think the point is not really to get innocent posters to
listen to him. The point is likely to piss Snit off for flooding outside
groups he knows I frequent.
--
Get Rich Slow
http://youtu.be/3NmOycD4yKU
http://youtu.be/u4xD43Khhkw
Dustin Cook is a functional illiterate fraud
Why does John Gohde focus on his own pride so much? John Gohde lies so
often that he has a difficult time keeping track of his misrepresentations.
Or his sock puppets of course. Yup. Clearly this is what we have to put
up with. Trolls who obviously have no reason for being here other than
to flood.

These posts are clearly NOT automated, they are made by a glue sniffing
stalker with a sick agenda who has way too much time on his hands (with
maybe some scripted pre-processing).

Now that nobody is responding to John Gohde, he's making it sound like
he's achieved some great victory -- when in fact, people are just beating
him at his own game.


--
Top Ten Ways John Gohde Trolls!
https://prescott-arizona.janbarham.org.au/yavapai-college-library-202.html/
<https://findwhocallsyou.com/4234911448?CallerInfo>
Steve 'Narcissistic Bigot' Carroll
Diesel / Gremlin
2021-09-11 08:15:41 UTC
Permalink
Post by Stefen Carroll - fretwizzer
Post by Steve Carroll
Post by Steve Carroll
When I got here, I wanted to be reasonable and nonjudgemental. I gave Snit
sock Snit Michael Glasser more than a credible person generally would.
How many more chances does Snit sock Snit Michael Glasser's dim witted
ass (a shoe knows more than Snit sock Snit Michael Glasser and is useful)
need to prove their Diesel spamming accusation with support?
Snit sock Snit Michael Glasser can only understand from the perspective
of a programmer. It was Snit sock Snit Michael Glasser who forged me (and
others) and admitted to having done so.
Don't get too egotistical, Snit sock Snit Michael Glasser, sometimes "cigars"
are just that. I quoted examples of Snit sock Snit Michael Glasser blaming
to repeat the same nonsense.
--
"You'll notice how quickly he loses interest when everything is about him.
He clearly wants the attention"
Steven Petruzzellis, making the dumbest comment ever uttered.
Dustin Cook AKA Diesel AKA Gremlin lying about his 1-423-491-1448 phone
-----
Prior to my giving you that cell number, there was no way
at all for you to link it to me in any possible way shape
or form. it doesn't come up in any records search on me.
It is using a recycled number, but damn near everything is
these days so that doesn't count as public information,
snit.
...
As in, the cell doesn't come back to me, wouldn't ever
come back to me, therefore the fact *I* have that cell
number is NOT public information. I find it very hard to
believe that even you'd have difficulty understanding this
concept.
-----
-----
I've only been sharing whats available via a public
database. You haven't. :)
-----
-----
You cannot find any link to that number to me on any
database. Which makes it private. not public as you
incorrectly assume.
-----
-----
Post by Steve Carroll
Your number, even tied to your name, is in a public
database.
No, it's not. You already tried to link the two of us
previously.
-----
-----
It's not a publically known number that links to me. And
he knows that.
-----
-----
The number is NOT TIED TO ME in any public database, in
any way shape or form. You cannot get the number aside
from my having provided it to you via a google search or a
public records search.
-----
-----
Regardless of where the number shows up, it doesn't tie
itself to me, and you cannot associate the number with me
via a google search, OR any number of free/paid public
records searches. Therefore, that is PRIVATE information
that you think you're holding over my head, not public as
you erroneously think here.
-----
-----
It's not, running my name doesn't provide that cell
number. The two are not linked in any way shape or form.
The number itself as is the case with any recycled number
is in all kinds of databases, but it's not linked to me;
therefore, that IS PRIVATE information that you can't get
via a google search or a paid public records search.
-----
-----
They are relevant to the fact YOU INSERTED the phone
number I provided you verbally into a bogus call log video
you've taken the time to create. When I use the cell I
provided you the number for to make outbound calls, It
*ALWAYS* reports Kingsport, TN. Not one single time has it
ever, nor would it have any reason to report Johnson City.
It doesn't pick cities at random, it doesn't go by my
present location, either. That's actually fixed, as is the
number assigned to the phone.
-----
-----
You didn't even score the right city, Snit. And, the
correct city is common, public knowledge with the regulars
here. The moment you unblocked 'Johnson City' in your
videos, you were busted.
-----
-----
David, every single Address you've posted that's supposed
to be mine has been Kingsport. Not Johnson City. Don't you
think you should tell snit that was a fuckup on his part
by now? :)
-----
-----
His response to that was to file a report with the
kingsport,tn police. Well hell, why not the johnson city
ones? That's where he claimed the call said it originated
from. :)
-----
--
Best CMS Solution of 2017!!
https://www.google.com/search?q=dustin+cook%3A+functionally+illiterate+fraud
https://www.bing.com/search?q=%22functionally%20illiterate%20fraud%22
Steve Petruzzellis the Narcissistic Bigot
It is a piece of cake to handpick by bragging about a small number of
exceptions clashing from what's typical. What is more important from an
advocacy perspective are the expected usages. How many more chances does
Flooder Steve Carroll's extremely dim witted ass (a dumb terminal knows
more than Flooder Steve Carroll and is useful) need to prove their Snit
sock accusation with support? Flooder Steve Carroll is far too unintelligent
to write a quality script. The only scripting he's ever shown he can do
is flooding groups.
The Clam engine had a false positive hit, and the GUI ClamXav reported
what the signal processor which isn't created by the same people or company
reported it. I think the point is not really to get innocent posters to
listen to him. The point is likely to piss Snit off for flooding outside
groups he knows I frequent.
--
Get Rich Slow
http://youtu.be/3NmOycD4yKU
http://youtu.be/u4xD43Khhkw
Dustin Cook is a functional illiterate fraud
I mostly go post by post unless someone has a past of especially extreme
bullshit. With Deplorable Owl, I already realize what his goal is, all
he hungers for is to harm Snit Michael Glasser and, regrettably, he'll
do *anything* to get it. His go to routine is to play 'shill' but reality
shows it is all of the group who are his marks. I suspect we have two
different ideas entirely. He is a fool -- folks have plonked his bot posts.
What he really needs is one that keeps switching names, then the auto-
posts have a possibility at being one quarter as annoying as he is. HA!
How did Deplorable Owl get _so_ vainglorious he believes everything is
about himself??


--
My Snoring Solution
<https://alt.computer.workshop.narkive.com/dCDisEHZ/dustin-cook-aka-diesel-
aka-gremlin-i-fucked-you-over-with-your-bank-account>
Steve Carroll the Narcissistic Bigot

Loading...