Post by STALKING_TARGET_56
At some point, if you bother to look... you would see that Carroll's
game is to 'unemotionally' incite people and then play 'fool'. You are
two seconds away from being in Michael Glasser Snit's kill file. Carroll
is a jerk folks have blocked his auto-posts. What he really needs to
figure out is one that keeps switching names, then they'd have a shot
at being almost as idiotic as he is. My view: Even if Carroll was simply
learning just for fun, the notion that obtaining intelligence as being
one of having "naught" to show for it doesn't make sense because you'll
plainly have the understanding to show for it and knowledge is important
for the future. I'm not irate, he wants me to be but I'm enjoying watching
because Carroll's lying is so obvious. He purposefully didn't list all
the benchmarks that he would quickly mock... and we all know why. At
least he has his own socks to back him. Not long ago I did work on and
showed some Visual C++ for the front end (only works on Wayland) which
is the only thing you can do when trying to avoid Carroll's narcissistic
crap while reading with Google Groups.
I Left My Husband & Daughter At Home And THIS happened!!
Steve 'Narcissistic Bigot' Petruzzellis
This is what Carroll does: he points to comment ABOUT people (made from real
people or socks), no matter how unsupported, and calls that evedence even
as he ignores what the target of his accusations actually has said.
Meanwhile I just point to what Carroll says:
And the reply:
Carroll admits to, at the very least, threats of harassing my employer,
then tries to minimize it by saying multiple posts somehow count as just
"one incident" of his outrageous behavior.
Then Carroll bizarrely insists people should WANT to be harassed by him
because that gives them a chance to prove they are innocent. Utter insanity!
He directly admits to the threats but tries to pretend he did not follow
through, but he gives away his game with this comment:
...here you *still* are, trying to make it appear that *I* should
feel guilty for blowing the whistle
He refers to his harassment as "blowing the whistle" -- but does not speak
of feeling guilty IF he had done so, but speaks about HAVING done so. He
tried to deny it, but then made it clear he harassed my employer.
To add more support to his admission there, he claims to not understand
how harassing people is bad, or how innocent people can be harmed by his
harassment. He admits he cannot see what is wrong with such harassment, but
then pretends he was stopped by some anonymous Jiminy Cricket who made him
rethink how wrong his actions are. Why does he contradict himself so much?
In short: He proves much of what I have been saying about him right there.
His words. No need to dig back.
After he screwed up, and as predicted, "new" people showed up. While he
currently is denying he uses such socks, in the past he has admitted to it:
I faked those Mac accounts, (i.e Toasty) because you
Yeah, he does bad things because his victims deserve it. That is his worldview...
he needs his anonymous Jiminy Cricket to stop him. He cannot stop himself.
Dustin Cook is a functional illiterate fraud